The case for chart rectification
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:00 am
I would like to advocate for the idea that charts must be rectified before they are analyzed. Here are the arguments:
The astrological factors in a chart, which depends on the birth time (in combination with the date, of course) seems to be far more important than the factors, which can be derived from the date alone. Two siblings, who are non-identical twins will have exactly the same horoscope, when you look at the date alone. It is only when the time is included, that the two charts becomes so different, that they can justify the differences between the non-identical twins.
Let me give an example. Caroline Knapp and Rebecca Knapp were born as two non-identical twins. Their fates, their appearances, yes, indeed everything about them, was totally different. You can find their charts and biographies here:
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Knapp,_Caroline
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Knapp,_Rebecca
And you can find photos of them here:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/41 ... line_Knapp
http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/phs ... ca%20Knapp
According to AstroDataBank, Rebecca Knapp was born November 8th 1959 at 23:08 in Boston, MA, and her twin sister was born the same date and the same place at 23:13. That means they would have the same ascendant and hence have very similar fates and appearances according to astrology.
It's only when you rectify the charts, the differences emerge. According to my rectifications, Rebecca was born 23:15:23, and Caroline was born November 9th at 0:10:59. This means that Rebecca was born with Leo rising and Caroline was born with Virgo rising - and that makes their charts totally different, at least when it comes to the time dependent factors.
I hope you find this subject interesting. If so, I shall be happy to demonstrate the rectification method I use, either with Rebecca's and Caroline's charts or with charts of your own preferences. Please consider what it means for e.g. research to have charts with exact birth times. As for astrological prognosis, I can asure you that they become much more precise, once the chart is rectified.
The astrological factors in a chart, which depends on the birth time (in combination with the date, of course) seems to be far more important than the factors, which can be derived from the date alone. Two siblings, who are non-identical twins will have exactly the same horoscope, when you look at the date alone. It is only when the time is included, that the two charts becomes so different, that they can justify the differences between the non-identical twins.
Let me give an example. Caroline Knapp and Rebecca Knapp were born as two non-identical twins. Their fates, their appearances, yes, indeed everything about them, was totally different. You can find their charts and biographies here:
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Knapp,_Caroline
http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Knapp,_Rebecca
And you can find photos of them here:
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/41 ... line_Knapp
http://academicdepartments.musc.edu/phs ... ca%20Knapp
According to AstroDataBank, Rebecca Knapp was born November 8th 1959 at 23:08 in Boston, MA, and her twin sister was born the same date and the same place at 23:13. That means they would have the same ascendant and hence have very similar fates and appearances according to astrology.
It's only when you rectify the charts, the differences emerge. According to my rectifications, Rebecca was born 23:15:23, and Caroline was born November 9th at 0:10:59. This means that Rebecca was born with Leo rising and Caroline was born with Virgo rising - and that makes their charts totally different, at least when it comes to the time dependent factors.
I hope you find this subject interesting. If so, I shall be happy to demonstrate the rectification method I use, either with Rebecca's and Caroline's charts or with charts of your own preferences. Please consider what it means for e.g. research to have charts with exact birth times. As for astrological prognosis, I can asure you that they become much more precise, once the chart is rectified.