Do certain objects/points "not count" for all aspects?

All, including 'abstract' aspects. Aspect patterns when well understood can give interesting insights not only into inherent dynamics but the ways in which an individual may develop.
Post Reply
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:49 pm

Do certain objects/points "not count" for all aspects?

Post by write2live » Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:00 am

Hi everyone!

This is my first post here. I'm glad I found this place! I've gotten a lot more into astrology over the past year and I think the aspects are the most fascinating part. I realize that the planets and the main points (midheaven, descendant etc) are the most important, but I also like looking at some of the asteroids/planetoids (Chiron, Lilith, Ceres, etc.).

My question is, do the lesser bodies like Chiron and others still count when determining aspects like T-squares, grand crosses or grand trines? Or are only the major bodies accounted for in that kind of thing?

User avatar
Noel Eastwood
Site Admin
Posts: 2011
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 5:04 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Do certain objects/points "not count" for all aspects?

Post by Noel Eastwood » Wed Oct 18, 2017 6:55 am

write2, a quick answer is... most astrologers use Chiron these days, some are using the asteroid goddesses and some are using the dwarf planets and trans-neptunians. Traditionally we don't include Asc or MC in Planetary Patterns, patterns are basically just for planets. I think the best way is to use the traditional planets in patterns then see if the newer asteroids and dwarfs add anything else to the reading. The danger is that the more points you add to a chart the more confusing it becomes until eventually all you have is 'noise'. The fewer the better, then slowly add the others one by one and see how they influence the chart.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests